Skip to main content

A Washington Post Epiphany

The Washington Post has had an epiphany. It discovered judges attempt to legislate from the bench! Today’s editorial entitled A Court Makes Up a Right expresses great distress over the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit decision to allow terminally ill adult patients access to new drugs, upon a doctor’s advice, even when the drug has not been approved by the FDA.

"The U.S. COURT of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit discovered a new constitutional right yesterday: "the right of a mentally competent, terminally ill adult patient to access potentially life-saving post-Phase I investigational new drugs, upon a doctor's advice, even where that medication carries risks for the patient" and has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. If you don't remember reading those particular words in the founding charter, don't kick yourself. An ideologically eclectic panel of the normally sober D.C. Circuit pulled this "right" out of thin air."


Actually, I do agree with the analysis of the editor. I think this decision has the potential to undermine the entire FDA drug approval process and puts the safety of consumers at risk. What I find ironic is the editor’s righteous indignation that the judicial branch would concoct a judgment that in effect created new law. There are a great number of constitutional “rights” the courts have pulled “right out of thin air”. The most notorious is a woman’s “constitutional right” to kill the child growing within her womb at any time during her pregnancy and for any reason. I haven’t heard much from the WaPo editor criticizing that judicial opinion. In fact, the WaPo is usually at the forefront defending it. Oh, and there is that constitutional requirement for separation of Church and State. (Please note the phrase separation of Church and State does not exist anywhere in the constitution) The WaPo is a staunch defender of judicial opinions that allege the constitution demands there be no official government acknowledgement that religion exists, especially if that religion is Christian. Thus we have Holiday Trees and Spring Bunnies.

Mr. Editor: You make a fine argument for the health hazards of this court decision. However, you lose all credibility when you claim the very basis of the court’s mistake was its discovery of new “rights” in the constitution. Are you really saying you hadn’t noticed this kind of judicial behavior until now? Where have you been?

Comments

Tony said…
I think this decision has the potential to undermine the entire FDA drug approval process and puts the safety of consumers at risk.

You mean the FDA drug approval process that approved Vioxx, Thimerisol and other associated drugs that ended up having deadly and/or life altering (for the worse) effects?

I think that a consumer in their right mind, armed with factual information, should be able to consume anything that he or she believes will help him or her.
Catholic Mom said…
The FDA is an imperfect system. It also gave us RU-486. It is still better than no system of regulation. Without it we are beholden to the drug companies to provide accurate information directly to consumers. That is definitely a fox guarding the hen house scenario. However, the real point of the post is the WaPo's amazement that the judiciary could have the audacity to legislate from the bench.
Tony said…
Oh, I know. :)

I just wanted to focus on the underlying issue, and suggest that FDA approval isn't really great shakes, especially when the FDA is controlled by politicians who take campaign contributions from... uhhh... drug companies ;)

We need to start focusing on wellness, and get away from prescribing drugs to handle symptoms caused by our own lifestyles.
Catholic Mom said…
As a retired physician, I will second that motion for less meds! This probably should be a post of its own and not a comment, but did you realize as Americans we spend more money on psychiatric medications for our children than we do on asthma or diabetic medications for our children.Fastest growing population on psychiatric meds is children under age 4. I know there are some children with true ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) who are really helped by meds. However, there is a large group of kids who really have ADD (Adult Discipline Disorder) and just need parenting instead of pills. I always wished I could write a prescription for that!
Tony said…
Don't get me started!

I have always said it's easier to prescribe Prozac for one teacher than Ritalin for a classroom of little boys :)

I have written about "little boy behavior bad, little girl behavior good" that permeates our schools. They attempt to force our little boys to behave like little girls, and if they don't they beat them into submission chemically.

Popular posts from this blog

Parent Letter from a Catechist

I am going to be teaching seventh grade CCD this year. We do most of the preparation for confirmation during this year since Confirmation is usually scheduled for the fall of the eighth grade year.I have composed a letter to the parents to try and keep them active in their children's religious education. I thought I would post it here and get your feedback before I send it out in a couple of weeks.

I am privileged to be your child’s seventh grade CCD teacher for the 2006-2007 school year. This is a very important year. We will focus on your child’s preparation for confirmation. Of course, you have already been preparing your child for this sacrament for many years. You are the primary catechist for your child. You show how important your Faith is by making Mass attendance a top priority and by family prayer.

Confirmation is one of the Sacraments of Initiation. It is a beginning. It is not a graduation. This year we will work to solidify the foundation of your child’s Catholic Faith.…

Dispelling the Myth of the Travel Dispensation

One of the fun things about having a site meter on my blog is I can see which posts garner the most attention. I can also see how people find my blog. One of the most read posts from my two years of blogging is this one that discusses finding Mass while traveling. I would like to think this post is so popular because it is so well written. The truth of the matter is that it generates so much traffic because I use the words “travel dispensation for Mass”—as in “There is no such thing as a travel dispensation for Mass.” I would guess that nearly a dozen times every week, someone googles “travel dispensation for Mass” and finds my blog. I wonder how many of these folks are poor souls trying to assuage their Catholic guilt with evidence of a justification for missing Mass while on the road.

I know that when I tell my seventh grade CCD students that attending Mass every Sunday is a commandment (one of the top ten!) and not just a pretty good idea they are amazed. Missing Mass has become so …

United Breaks Guitars

This guy is really talented and what a creative way to get your message across. I think he captured the "indifferent employee" perfectly. They don't just work for airlines. I think I ran into them at Walmart on Friday!