Skip to main content

A New Translation of the Mass?

This week’s National Catholic Register is covering the upcoming vote by the U.S. bishops on the new English translation of the Order of the Mass. The new translation is more faithful to the original Latin. However, some bishops prefer the current more contemporary language. Leading the charge against the new translation is Bishop Trautman. Quoting from the Register:

But Bishop Trautman told the Register that he and about half of the nation’s bishops believe the proposed text contains too many complicated words, as well as sentences and phrases that are too long. The words “precious chalice,” for example, replace the word “cup” during the consecration prayers.

“To me, ‘precious chalice’ says something gold with diamonds all around it,” Bishop Trautman said. “Jesus used a drinking cup at the last supper, not a precious chalice”


Interesting. I don’t think of the “precious chalice” as covered with diamonds. I think of it as containing the Real Presence of Christ. That is why we call it the Precious Blood, not wine.

Actually, I think a key point to consider is Bishop Trautman’s effort to use current and contemporary language. We have a dynamic language. What is current and contemporary today will not be so twenty, thirty, or forty years from now. Anybody still saying “groovy”? The Mass on the other hand is timeless. Staying faithful to an unchanging Latin rite offers stability. The push to maintain a “current and contemporary” English translation is actually a very narrow and self-centered view.

I also find it very insulting to the laity to say we are not smart enough to learn and adapt to a translation that uses big words and long sentences. The Church and the Mass have existed for 2000 years. Only forty of those years have we been celebrating it in the vernacular. Is Bishop Trautman suggesting that during those other 1,960 years when the faithful learned Latin, they could not appreciate the liturgy as well as the faithful of the last forty years? Judging by the state of vocations and Mass attendance now compared to forty years ago, I would have to strongly disagree with such an assertion.

I believe Archbishop Chaput put it best when he stated in the Register:

“It seems to me that if the translations of the past are incorrect or inadequate, they should be changed. How we pray influences how we believe,” he added. “I’m convinced that the Church can find a beautiful translation that’s faithful to Liturgiam Authenticam

Comments

Michelle said…
I really think the Bishop is wrong by claiming that Jesus used a "drinking cup" and not a precious chalice. To me, this implies that Jesus picked up any old cup and used it with little regard for the significance of what he was doing, as if he didn't know.

Jesus was particpating in a seder. They had special reserved dishes used just for this meal. They had special "cups" used just once a year for this feast. This would be like saying Grandma's china, reserved for Christmas Eve dinner, isn't "precious".

And given Christ's forethought about what was truly going to be happening - the Last Passover with the Blood of the New Covenant - I can not fathom that Christ would have used a common drinking cup or that, even if he had, that same cup would have later been reincorporated with common dishes. The mere fact that we keep all the chalices used for Mass in a special place and only use them for Mass (and not allow them to be used for any other purpose) makes them precious. And yes, the fact that it holds the Blood of our Salvation makes it precious too.

Popular posts from this blog

Parent Letter from a Catechist

I am going to be teaching seventh grade CCD this year. We do most of the preparation for confirmation during this year since Confirmation is usually scheduled for the fall of the eighth grade year.I have composed a letter to the parents to try and keep them active in their children's religious education. I thought I would post it here and get your feedback before I send it out in a couple of weeks.

I am privileged to be your child’s seventh grade CCD teacher for the 2006-2007 school year. This is a very important year. We will focus on your child’s preparation for confirmation. Of course, you have already been preparing your child for this sacrament for many years. You are the primary catechist for your child. You show how important your Faith is by making Mass attendance a top priority and by family prayer.

Confirmation is one of the Sacraments of Initiation. It is a beginning. It is not a graduation. This year we will work to solidify the foundation of your child’s Catholic Faith.…

Dispelling the Myth of the Travel Dispensation

One of the fun things about having a site meter on my blog is I can see which posts garner the most attention. I can also see how people find my blog. One of the most read posts from my two years of blogging is this one that discusses finding Mass while traveling. I would like to think this post is so popular because it is so well written. The truth of the matter is that it generates so much traffic because I use the words “travel dispensation for Mass”—as in “There is no such thing as a travel dispensation for Mass.” I would guess that nearly a dozen times every week, someone googles “travel dispensation for Mass” and finds my blog. I wonder how many of these folks are poor souls trying to assuage their Catholic guilt with evidence of a justification for missing Mass while on the road.

I know that when I tell my seventh grade CCD students that attending Mass every Sunday is a commandment (one of the top ten!) and not just a pretty good idea they are amazed. Missing Mass has become so …

United Breaks Guitars

This guy is really talented and what a creative way to get your message across. I think he captured the "indifferent employee" perfectly. They don't just work for airlines. I think I ran into them at Walmart on Friday!