KITCHEN TABLE CHATS

Pull up a chair in my domestic church and let's chat!

I have worn many labels (Not in any particular order): Catholic, Wife, Mom,Gramma, Doctor, Major, Soccer Mom, Military Wife, Professor, Fellow.

All of these filter my views of the world. I hope that like St. Monica, I can through prayer, words and example, lead my children and others to Faith.
"The important thing is that we do not let a single day go by in vain without putting it to good use for eternity"--Blessed Franz J├Ągerst├Ątter

Monday, August 31, 2009

The Slippery Slope of Sexual Immorality Continues

Following the lead of the Episcopalians, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America recently voted to allow their clergy to be in "committed, lifelong, same-gender relationships." This did not sit well with Reverend Debra Haffner, an ordained Unitarian Universalist minister. She objects to the requirement for the relationships to be committed and life-long:

All of this is excellent news for same-sex couples, of course, but the emphasis on "committed, lifelong relationships" leaves out the single minister, the divorced minister, the widowed minister -- whether gay, straight, or bisexual -- who must still adhere to a standard of celibacy unless their partner status changes.
I've long believed that the major sexuality problem denominations face is that they are unable to acknowledge that celibacy until marriage doesn't apply to most single adults. There are more than 75 million American adults who are single -- more than at any time in history. We are marrying later, divorcing at high levels, and living longer, so more of us will be widowed. And as a whole, we're having sexual relationships when we aren't in marriages.


As Director of the Religious Institute on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing, Reverend Haffner thinks celibacy and chastity are overrated:

The Religious Institute has long called for a new sexual ethic to replace the traditional "celibacy until marriage, chastity after." This new ethic is free of double standards based on sexual orientation, sex, gender or marital status. It calls for sexual relationships to be consensual, non-exploitative, honest, pleasurable and protected, whether inside or outside of a covenanted relationship. It insists that intimate relationships be grounded in communication and shared values.


Take a look at this Religious Declaration on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing. Then take a look at the list of endorsers for this document. They include:

  • Sister Eileen Brady, Roman Catholic, Manchester, NH
  • Natanael Mateus-Ruiz, Campus Minister, Roman Catholic, Stratford, Ontario
  • Rev. Edward J. Shields, Roman Catholic, Seattle, WA
  • Rev. Gary Southerton, Roman Catholic, Seattle, WA
  • Father Edward J. Dietrich, Roman Catholic, Palm Springs, CA

There are also several endorsers who claim to be Roman Catholic although they do not list themselves as holding leadership positions in the Church.

It seems to me that the bishops have a responsibility to discipline those members of the Catholic Church, especially those who hold a title of leadership or responsibility, who endorse such a radical sexual morality. At the very least, the bishops must speak out when priests and religious preach in error in the Church's name. Yet I have Googled these names and found nothing to indicate any formal objection from the episcopate. Is it because they do not know of this scandal? What should a faithful Catholic do?

1 comment:

Peter Brown said...

Might be worth emailing the statement to the bishops involved, with a cover letter saying, in effect, "FYI." The odds are very high that nothing will be done, but at that point it's the relevant bishop's problem rather than yours.

WRT the logic of the slope itself, I am totally unsurprised. Given that our culture can't agree on what sex is for beyond having fun, and given further that there's no real underpinning for sexual morality in mainline Protestantism, it's not a matter of whether those churches will sign on to some form of "if it feels good, do it." It's a question of how fast.

Peace,
--Peter