Skip to main content

The HHS mandate is only one reason Obamacare has to go!


Can we take a step back here? Clearly the HHS mandate that requires the Catholic Church to pay for contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients is an affront to religious liberty. This is being acknowledged from both ends of the political spectrum. At least 92% of the bishops who head a diocese in the United States have spoken out forcefully in opposition to the mandate. They have been joined by leaders of many other religious communities. Even the secular press is presenting this as a religious freedom issue. So how did we get here?

This issue is before us because the Secretary of HHS declared that contraception, sterilization, and the use of abortifacients (morning-after pill) are preventive medicine. This is an error as I argued here. Contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients are elective medical interventions. They are lifestyle choices. Preventive medicine prevents disease and maintains health. Contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients take a perfectly healthy reproductive system and render it sterile. So why did the Secretary of HHS include these elective medical options as mandated preventive care? Because Obamacare says she can.

The real danger of Obamacare is not the specific medical requirements outlined in the bill. The danger is the power this bill ceded to HHS. The Secretary of HHS has the power to set up all kinds of committees and commissions to determine what will be covered care and who will get it. For example, Obamacare will fund the Patient Centered Outcome Research Institute (PCORI) to the tune of $600 million dollars a year to research ways of cutting medical costs. Of course that means the PCORI has to “find” $600 million dollars of “unnecessary” care to justify its existence. Would you trust Blue Cross to do research to determine what is the best medical practice? I wouldn’t. Their financial interest in spending as little as possible on medical care would bias their judgment. The same thing will happen with the PCORI. They are tasked to set best medical practice standards with the ultimate goal of cutting costs. However, the cheapest care is not always the optimal care for the patient. Do you want an organization that is tasked with cutting medical expenses to be responsible for setting therapeutic guidelines?

The fight for religious liberty is the only the first battle of Obamacare. The next battle will be the fight for our eligibility for care. Perhaps the PCORI says we are too old for care. Or the PCORI says we are too disabled to warrant care. Or the PCORI says nutrition and hydration are optional care. If this legislation stands we will soon be fighting for our lives.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Parent Letter from a Catechist

I am going to be teaching seventh grade CCD this year. We do most of the preparation for confirmation during this year since Confirmation is usually scheduled for the fall of the eighth grade year.I have composed a letter to the parents to try and keep them active in their children's religious education. I thought I would post it here and get your feedback before I send it out in a couple of weeks.

I am privileged to be your child’s seventh grade CCD teacher for the 2006-2007 school year. This is a very important year. We will focus on your child’s preparation for confirmation. Of course, you have already been preparing your child for this sacrament for many years. You are the primary catechist for your child. You show how important your Faith is by making Mass attendance a top priority and by family prayer.

Confirmation is one of the Sacraments of Initiation. It is a beginning. It is not a graduation. This year we will work to solidify the foundation of your child’s Catholic Faith.…

Dispelling the Myth of the Travel Dispensation

One of the fun things about having a site meter on my blog is I can see which posts garner the most attention. I can also see how people find my blog. One of the most read posts from my two years of blogging is this one that discusses finding Mass while traveling. I would like to think this post is so popular because it is so well written. The truth of the matter is that it generates so much traffic because I use the words “travel dispensation for Mass”—as in “There is no such thing as a travel dispensation for Mass.” I would guess that nearly a dozen times every week, someone googles “travel dispensation for Mass” and finds my blog. I wonder how many of these folks are poor souls trying to assuage their Catholic guilt with evidence of a justification for missing Mass while on the road.

I know that when I tell my seventh grade CCD students that attending Mass every Sunday is a commandment (one of the top ten!) and not just a pretty good idea they are amazed. Missing Mass has become so …

United Breaks Guitars

This guy is really talented and what a creative way to get your message across. I think he captured the "indifferent employee" perfectly. They don't just work for airlines. I think I ran into them at Walmart on Friday!